Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SundayStyle's avatar

You know, a citizen may want to know WHY Medicaid cuts are "a critical piece of Republicans’ sweeping domestic policy bill," may want to know where the money that will allegedly be saved kicking millions off healthcare is going to go?

Spoiler: billionaires. But it would be RUDE of the NYT to point out who will benefit. It's important to reflect both sides: 330 million Americans on one side, roughly 90 billionaires on the other. Fair and balanced.

Expand full comment
litbrit's avatar

I'm so sick of the both-siderism, it isn't funny. A day or two ago--it all blurs into itself, at this point--I saw a Bluesky post from a NYT writer saying they wouldn't "yet" label Tubby's crypto scandal and impending Qatari luxury-jet gift as "corruption" or "bribery" because neither met their stringent house definition of either term until and unless there was something already received by the players in return for their "gifts" to Tubby. IOW, until there is a proven Quid in existence as a result of the already-happened Quo, they'd stand back uncritically, no matter what "social media wants to say".

Yeah, I kinda let him have it, quoting a few quaint journalistic standards they used to teach back in my day, but as we all know, it never lands.

Expand full comment
91 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?