Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SundayStyle's avatar

Does Godwin's Law still even apply in our current environment? Or has it morphed into arguments about whether Trump more closely resembles Hitler or Mussolini?

I bring this up because you can, if you dig deep enough with moral blinders on, find a rationale for why people -- and even people you refer to as kinda sorta friends -- support all manner of appalling things. Most of the German people, humiliated after WWI, were happy to support a monster who could identify the enemies without and within, and who promised to conquer or purge them. Those German people had "reasons." I'll bet Brooks would have been kinda sorta friends with many of them.

Another thing, and this one strikes me as really funny, is the way Brooks' oblique references to the people he socializes with -- but only at arm's length! -- mirrors the working class version: "I know a guy who knows a guy." I'm sure David would be horrified to know the unwashed proletariats developed that euphemism before he did.

Derelict's avatar

Is there some sort of descriptor we can come up with for folks like Bill Barr? Barr stated quite publicly that Donald Trump is manifestly unfit to be president . . . but Barr was going to vote for Trump because the alternative was a Democrat.

In the run-up to last year's election catastrophe, I heard variations on this theme from a lot of my conservative associates--Trump was obviously corrupt, obviously stupid, obviously incapable of running the country, obviously sliding into dementia, obviously unfit; and yet, the alternative was a Democrat, so what could they do?!?!?!?

157 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?