26 Comments
Jun 13, 2019Liked by Roy Edroso

So much of the defense of capitalism is just the usual sophistry that passes for argument by Rightwingers. All that's different is the subject. In this case, the baseline argument is "You bought something; therefore, you cannot hate capitalism!" In other contexts, it's "Al Gore lives in a house; therefore, global warming is a hoax!" or "AOC wears decent clothes; therefore, she cannot represent people!"

This is why I have completely given up discussing any substantive issue with Rightwingers I know. It's like arguing with an obstinate child because every discussion comes down to "I know you are, but what am I?"

Expand full comment
Jun 13, 2019Liked by Roy Edroso

Considering how much effort has been spent making “socialism” a dirty word (and not just Fartboy’s “Nazis were socialists” stupidity) it’s kinda amazing we’re taking it back as an answer to the depredations of unregulated corporate capitalism. Maybe there’s hope for us yet. (Yeah, having a nice breakfast puts me in a Pollyanna mood.)

Expand full comment
Jun 13, 2019Liked by Roy Edroso

I indulged myself in the pleasure of re-reading the linked, 2010 column on the fire that destroyed a house because the owners didn't pay their $75/year fire insurance. The libertarian/conservatives all thought that this was mere just desserts and completely swell — yet felt the necessity of emphatically piling on to justify it. I thought these people prided themselves on their superior historical memories: Ben Franklin co-founded America's first volunteer fire department. It operated on a subscription basis, a beautifully capitalist, free-market system in which rival fire companies would not put out fires unless the homeowner subscribed to their particular company. And somehow, Americans felt the need to move away from a perfect free-market system and create municipal fire departments which protect everyone, and in the process, they invented Big Government. How could our forefathers have so carelessly strayed from the path of libertarian righteousness? Why don't our libertarian/conservative brethren ask why?

Expand full comment
Jun 13, 2019Liked by Roy Edroso

I’ve long thought that the demise of the Soviet Union had some unfortunate consequences for the Russians, of course, but also for those of us in the Land of the Free. It threw the political metabolism off-kilter: for one thing, we found ourselves obliged to consume domestically a lot of toxic rhetoric that had formerly been produced for export. A direr consequence was the withdrawal of a countervailing socioeconomic ethos which, however imperfectly(!) realized under the Soviets, represented a seductive alternative to the western model (a tipsy Brezhnev-era apparatchik one said to a visiting American, after acknowledging that Lenin might have been dismayed at what the USSR had become, “Nevertheless, the ideals *my* country has betrayed are nobler than the ideals *your* country has betrayed”), one our plutocrats instinctively feared, and the existence of which served in some measure to constrain them. With that spectre no longer haunting its dreams, Capital red in tooth and claw has behaved as we might have expected.

Expand full comment

I suppose it's worth saying that they're defending capitalism against attacks that don't exist. No one is saying, "chuck the whole thing and do something else." They're saying, "no one person should be able to own more wealth than 100 million others put together." No one is saying, "nationalize everything." They're saying, "our health care system is psychotic and our way of living is destroying the planet."

So when the brethren defend capitalism per se (however ineptly) against what they imply are existential threats, could we be witnessing a bit of projection? After all, they're right-wing, which means authoritarian, which means absolutists. In their all-or-nothing, Manichean unconscious, maybe they believe that capitalism's undeniable flaws mean it should be extirpated for good.

Expand full comment

George Will this very morn did a column on socialism where he claims that the younguns "haven't thought it through" and believe that "socialism" mainly means "being more sociable with each other". Typical "grandpa knows better than you" bullshit, in other words.

Expand full comment

(Never was the metaphor "(S)train at a gnat and swallow a camel" more appropriate for an essay.)

Expand full comment

"...enabling them to listen to a library of music that they could carry in their pocket. The iPhone appeared in 2007, just in time to turbocharge their teenage social life"

Sure, and the Great Library appeared in 300 BC, enabling me to read any book ever, and denim appeared in 1873 -- just in time to turbocharge my teenage social life. So I guess I want to speak Classical Greek and work in a copper mine.

Expand full comment

Lovely read, plus the comments make me laugh out loud and remember a lot I've had to set aside because of having to focus on meaningless work for pointless growth, like a cancerous sellout in the huddle of teamed refuse, yearning to buy freedom.

Expand full comment